Jan Mohd.Ali Mohd.Chandiwala v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Application is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
... Mr.Milind Dhond i/b Chandrakant Talekar Advocate for Applicants Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2005 P.C.P.C. P.C.
Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
By order dated 10.12.2003, the applicants were granted bail. The condition was imposed on the applicants that they shall report to the Investigating Officer i.e. (ACP Ambadas Pote) once in a fortnight. The learned advocate for the -2- applicants has submitted that ACP Ambadas Pote has been transferred from Mumbai and posted outside Mumbai, hence, it is difficult for the applicants to report to the Investigating Officer who has been posted out of Mumbai. In this view of the matter, the said condition is modified and instead, the applicants shall report to the Seniormost Officer of DCB CID, Mumbai once in a fortnight.
Operative part
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 26 Oct 2005. The bench was V K TAHILRAMANI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.