Sanjeev Kumar Raman Harijan v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V C DAGA
Outcome
Disposed of
Application is disposed of in above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 201, 302
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.
Perused application and the material available on record.
The applicant, arrested in connection C.R. No.71 2007 registered Wadala Police Station offence punishable Sections 302, 201, Section 34 of the I.P.C., is seeking bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.
According to the prosecution, on
13.4.2007 7:30 a.m. Wadala Railway Station Master received information person injured condition Panvel General Compartment. Therefore, issued memo P.No. 2843 Mr Rahate Wadala Railway Station complainant reached platform No.4. He rescued injured Helper. The complainant noticed oozing injured person present throat inserted mouth. The injured person compartment The The referred Hospital. doctor examination declared dead. F.I.R. lodged; wherein, present applicant was shown as one of the associate to the deceased.
During the course of investigation, statement Mohanlal recorded; wherein, deposed deceased The present applicant assaulted and, therefore, witness incident assault deceased. post-mortem report except injury on the neck region may be due to strangulation, there was no other injury.
Considering the material available on record, I connection applicant alleged offence continue detention applicant further, I inclined to the applicant on following terms and conditions:- a] The applicant arrested connection C.R.No.71 2007 registered Wadala Police Station Sections 302, 201 Section 34 IPC enlarged Rs. 25,000/-with sureties amount. b] He report Police Station Wadala a i.e. Saturday between
3.00
Operative part
5.00 p.m. conclusion c] The applicant not, directly indirectly, inducement trial. threat prosecution witnesses not, manner, tamper prosecution evidence. d] The applicant shall co-operate with the learned Trial Judge for expeditious disposal of the case. Any attempt by the applicant to delay the trial may be a ground for cancellation of bail. e] Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. Application is disposed of in above
terms. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) (V.C.
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of in above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 201, 302; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.