Maheshkant Muljibhai Makawana & Ors. v. NONE
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Cited in this judgment
Summary
A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.
Precedent status
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
Original judgment text
....Petitioners. (Orig.Defendants) ....Respondent. (Orig.Plaintiff) Mr.Tejpal S.Indale for the Petitioners. Mr.M.R.Katikar for the Respondent. ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. CORAM : : : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. CORAM ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. CORAM : 10th DECEMBER, 2008. DATED : 10th DECEMBER, 2008. DATED : 10th DECEMBER, 2008. DATED ( 2 ) JUDGMENT:- JUDGMENT:- JUDGMENT:- The Petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 17/06/2008 passed by the District Judge-I, Ichalkaranji whereby allowing the Revision Application filed by the original plaintiff, quashed and set aside the order (partly rejected) passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ichalkaranji, thereby allowed the prayer of the Respondents to amend the plaint by holding that the Revision is tenable under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 (for short,"the Bombay Rent Act").
2. I have already taken a view in Writ Petition No.5435 Writ Petition No.5435 Writ Petition No.5435 ofofof 2008 (Abeda Iqbal Karbhari alias Abeda Iqbal Patel 2008 (Abeda Iqbal Karbhari alias Abeda Iqbal Patel 2008 (Abeda Iqbal Karbhari alias Abeda Iqbal Patel Vs.Vs.Vs. Cormorant Investment Pvt. Ltd.) Cormorant Investment Pvt. Ltd.) decided on Cormorant Investment Pvt. Ltd.) 10/12/2008, that such Revision is maintainable by observing as under:- "19. It is pertinent to reproduce the observations of the Supreme Court in Gurdev Kaur & ors. v. Kaki & Gurdev Kaur & ors. v. Kaki & Gurdev Kaur & ors. v. Kaki &