Judgment · High Court · 2009
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard Advocate for the applicant. A case is made out for grant of leave. Leave is granted. Appeal is admitted. Call for Record and Proceedings. There will be action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973.
Judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2532 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2532 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2532 OF 2007 CRIMINAL Union of India vs. ...Applicant
#1. Rajkumar Sheetalprasad Kaknani & Others ...Respondents Ms P.H.Kantharia for the applicant Mr.Y.S.Shinde A.P.P. for State A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: : FEBRUARY 20,2009 DATE : FEBRUARY 20,2009 DATEDATE : FEBRUARY 20,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
#1. Heard Advocate for the applicant. A case is made out for grant of leave. Leave is granted. Appeal is admitted. Call for Record and Proceedings. There will be action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973.
#2. However, it is made clear that the concerned respondents shall be forthwith enlarged on bail in appropriate amount. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Feb 2009. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.