✦ Bombay High Court · 24 Apr 2009

Uttam R. Pawar v. Mrs.Mansi U. Pawar

S VAZIFDAR3 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
24 Apr 2009
Bench
S VAZIFDAR

Provisions considered

Judgment

alimony and both the parties filed a joint application for amendment of Petition No.A-1180 of 2004 so as to convert into a Petition under Section 13-B of the : 2 : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for divorce by consent. By a separate order, the said application has been allowed by us.

3.

Both the parties are present before us and the Respondent has acknowledged to have received a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- as was given to her by the Appellant. She also stated that the settlement so as to seek divorce by consent is by her own free will and without any force or coercion. We are satisfied that the settlement between the parties is bona-fide and in the interest of both on them, more so when both the parties agreed that the marriage between them has reached a deadend.

4.

On the issue of the custody of two minor children (twins), it is agreed that their custody shall remain with the father and the mother will have access to meet the children initially once in two weeks (on second and fourth Sunday). The Appellant has agreed that both the children will be taken to Mahila Dakshata Samiti, Dadar (West), Near Kabutarkhana on every second and fourth Sunday at

10.00 a.m. and they will be left there in the company of the Respondent - mother till 5.00 p.m. The Appellant or any of this family members will collect the minor children from Mahila Dakshata Samiti : 3 : premises at 5.00 p.m. This arrangement shall continue to operate initially for about two months and if a proper rapport develops between the mother and the children, the children could be reached to her house every alternate week and preferably on Sunday. She will give here permanent address to the Appellant after two months. Thus the place of access shall be shifted from Mahila Dakshata Samiti, Dadar (West) to the house of the Respondent after June, 2009.

5.

Hence, we allow this Appeal. The marriage solemnized between the parties on 20.2.1998 hereby stands dissolved by consent of the parties under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. We direct that a decree of divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 be issued forthwith. So far as the access to the minor children is concerned, the mother will have access on every second and fourth Sunday initially at Mahila Dakshata Samiti, Dadar (West) and subsequently at her residence, as noted hereinabove between 10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m.

6.

The parties to bear their own costs. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)

(B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 24 Apr 2009. The bench was S VAZIFDAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments