Rajen Chandrakant v. Sanjay Chakraborthy & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2989 OF 2010 Rajen Chandrakant VS. ...Applicant Sanjay Chakraborthy & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Chinmay Bhosale i/b. Mr.Snehal V. Khairnar for the Applicant. Smt.M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : APRIL 6, 2011 P.C :- Notices issued to respondent nos.1 and 2 have been returned unserved with remark (cid:28) Not residing at given address and whereabouts not known(cid:29) . The applicant to take steps for taking recourse to the alternate modes of service under the Cr.P.C. within a week. Failure to do so would entail the dismissal of this application without further reference to this Court.
(U.D. SALVI, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Apr 2011. The bench was U D SALVI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.