✦ Bombay High Court · 30 Apr 2026

Murlidhar Gopinath Bhor v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Wp No. 11323 of 2019HITEN S VENEGAVKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Petition and therefore the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. None appears for the Petitioner. This Writ Petition has been filed in the year 2019 and the record suggest that not even once the Petitioner or his Advocate has shown any inclination of getting the matter circulated before the Court. Learned Advocate appearing for…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11323 OF 2019 Murlidhar Gopinath Bhor … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents None for the Petitioner. Mr. P.V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for Respondent – State. **** **** CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 30th APRIL, 2026 P.C. :

Operative part

2.

None appears for the Petitioner. This Writ Petition has been filed in the year 2019 and the record suggest that not even once the Petitioner or his Advocate has shown any inclination of getting the matter circulated before the Court. Learned Advocate appearing for the State also submits that copies also have not supplied upon the State Government. Since the matter has been pending in this Court for last seven years without the same being even moved for preliminary hearing or issuance of notice, I am of the opinion that the Petitioner and his Advocate have lost interest in the Petition and therefore the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) Purti Parab 1

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition and therefore the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 30 Apr 2026. The bench was HITEN S VENEGAVKAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wp No. 11323 of 2019). ← Search more judgments