✦ Bombay High Court

Nhava Sheva Port and General v. Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 1630 of 1994D B BHOSALE, B H MARLAPALLE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.Jaiprakash Sawant for petitioner. Ms.S.I.Shah for Resp. No.2. Petitioner Respondents CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. April 18, 2006. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties admittedly Central Administrative Tribunal seized Reference deciding status Petitioner-Union’s members employees contractor principal employer and, therefore, petition disposed withdrawn. This order will petitioner-Union challenge Section 42(3) of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 in future, if so advised. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)

(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1630 of 1994). ← Search more judgments