✦ Bombay High Court · 04 Nov 2004

Kay Iron Works Private Limited v. Jamkhandi Sugars Ltd & Ors.

Arbitration Petition No. 37 of 2004

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Nov 2004

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 37 OF 2004 Kay Iron Works Private Limited ...Petitioner Versus Jamkhandi Sugars Ltd. and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the Petitioner. Mr.P.B.Shah for the Respondents. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 2004. P.C. I request Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N.Venkatachaliah, former Chief Justice of India, to act as an Umpire in these proceedings. According to the agreement, proceedings have to be conducted under the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940. A copy of this order would be sent to the learned Umpire. No further directions are necessary in this Petition and consequently this petition is accordingly

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Arbitration Act, 1940.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 04 Nov 2004.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Arbitration Petition No. 37 of 2004). ← Search more judgments