✦ Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 3661 of 2007 · Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 3661 of 2007B H MARLAPALLE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

29/9/1992. Being aggrieved dismissal order, plaintiffs Regular Civil Appeal No. 463 1992 before District Court Kolhapur. Appeal dismissed The lower Appellate Court vide its judgment and order dated 9/12/2002. . Civil The petitioners, therefore, a statutory remedy filing a Revision Application Section 115 C.P.C. in Writ Petition No. 4138 2006 24/8/2006. When a statutory remedy available, a Writ Petition Article 227 the Constitution need not be entertained. . Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed liberty petitioners a Civil Revision Application application within a period today, period pendency petition consideration condonation delay, Annexures be returned, if applied for. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) any.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3661 of 2007). ← Search more judgments