✦ Bombay High Court

Bhagwan Vitthal Bhore v. The State of Maharashtra

Criminal Appeal No. 645 of 2007B H MARLAPALLE3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

appeal is disposed off accordingly

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33 . In this appeal today Shri Suryakant Tukaram Bhore affidavit stated residents village incident occurred 1993 inimical relationship otherwise contrary relations between parties presently friendly cordial. The disputes reason incident amicably settled during 14 untoward incident between parties. He states settlement between parties without…

Judgment

22/5/2007. The appellant accused convicted offence punishable Section 323 IPC sentenced suffer RI months a Rs.500/-, default payment fine, suffer further RI months. He granted the benefit of set off against the jail period, if any.

2.

It appears that on 16/7/1993 there was some quarrel between groups viz. Tukaram Bhore second Vitthal Bhore quarrel persons either groups sustained injuries. On complaint Tukaram Bhore, Sessions Case No.116 2005 against present appellant whereas complaint Vitthal Bhore, Bhimashankar Tukaram Bhore, Atmanand of Maruti Waghmare Madhukar Shivram Bhore Sessions Case No.115 2005 judgment 22/5/2007, accused no.1 - Bhimashankar convicted offence punishable Section 307 IPC sentenced suffer RI a of Rs. 2000/- default thereof, suffer further RI months. Accused no.1 - Bhimashankar acquitted offences punishable Sections 323, 504, 506 Section 34 IPC. Similarly accused acquitted charges. The conviction sentence is under challenge in Criminal Appeal No.561 of 2007.

Operative part

3.

In this appeal today Shri Suryakant Tukaram Bhore affidavit stated residents village incident occurred 1993 inimical relationship otherwise contrary relations between parties presently friendly cordial. The disputes reason incident amicably settled during 14 untoward incident between parties. He states settlement between parties without pressure parties incident further. He has, therefore, prayed compounding offence punishable Section 323 IPC against appellant. Shri Kulkarni, therefore, prayed appropriate order of this Court under Section 320(6) of Cr.P.C. for compounding the offence. . The prayer for compounding is hereby allowed Section 320(6) Cr.P.C. appellant stands acquitted offence punishable Section 323 IPC. Consequently impugned of conviction and sentence is hereby quashed and the 4 appeal is disposed off accordingly. . Criminal Application No.791 of 2007 does not survive and the same stands disposed.

(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is disposed off accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307, 323; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 320(6).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 645 of 2007). ← Search more judgments