Ganpat Dadabhau Bagad & Ors. v. None appears
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 06 May 2005
- Bench
- R M LODHA, R S MOHITE
Provisions considered
- Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 s. 33(5)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. We, accordingly, dismiss the writ petition in default. The order of status-quo is discharged. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (R.S. MOHITE,J.) MOHITE,J.) (R.S. (R.S. MOHITE,J.)
Judgment
P.C.
21st January 2002 passed Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, affirming Collector, Pune 17th September
2001. By 17th September 2001, District Collector, Pune dispute Section 33(5) Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 cancelled election 24th July 2001 Sarpanch Deputy Sarpanch of Grampanchayat-Pargaon, via-Madha, taluka Junnar, District: Pune.
From proceedings appears 5th March 2002 Division Bench Court called 2 record proceedings dispute application no.12/2001 a direction record called within thereafter meanwhile ordered status-quo maintained. passed thereafter proceedings dispute application no.12/2001 received office. It appears More record petitioners already relief desired status-quo passed Court March
2002. The tenure election Panchayat 5th term 2001-2005 itself appears to be over and it is for this reason that nobody appears for the petitioner.
We, accordingly, dismiss the writ petition in default. The order of status-quo is discharged. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (R.S. MOHITE,J.) MOHITE,J.) (R.S.
(R.S. MOHITE,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 — s. 33(5).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 May 2005. The bench was R M LODHA, R S MOHITE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.