Dadaso Bhupal Patil & Ors. v. Vilas Shivmurti Phalle & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr.P.D.Pise for the petitioners. Mr.P.M.Arjunwadkar for the respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17th August 2009. P.C.: . By the impugned order, an application made by the petitioners under Rule 9 of Order XXVI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been rejected. The cross-examination of the witness of the plaintiffs is in progress. The order impugned is of purely interlocutory nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred against the decree. Moreover, if the trial Court deems it necessary, at any stage, the said Court can always exercise powers under Rule 9 of Order XXVI of the said Code. Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is not entertained and the same is
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 17 Aug 2009. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.