Shri Manohar Limba Kevale v. The State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In that view of the matter, the impugned order, in so far as direction to furnish bank guarantee of equivalent amount, is quashed and set aside. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the amount without furnishing bank guarantee.
Judgment
Shri Manohar Limba Kevale. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... ... Petitioner. Respondent. S.N.Gawde i/b. Ram & Co. for the petitioner. S.D.Rayrikar, AGP for the respondent. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 6th February 2013. P.C. : Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.
#2. The petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 30th December 2009 passed below Exh.15 thereby allowing the application filed by the present petitioner for withdrawal of amount, however, on furnishing bank guarantee of equivalent amount. In the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the State, it is stated that the State does not have any objection for withdrawal of amount without even insisting for bank guarantee.
#3. In that view of the matter, the impugned order, in so far as direction to furnish bank guarantee of equivalent amount, is quashed and set aside. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the amount without furnishing bank guarantee.
#4. Rule is made absolute in terms of this order with no order as to costs. Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.