Criminal Application No. 3791 of 2005 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Application is disposed of in the above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Arms Act, 1959 ss. 3, 25
- Bombay Police Act, 1951 ss. 37(1), 135
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Hence Applicant entitled enlarged bail by reason of parity. Hence the following order is passed: (i) The Applicant enlarged connection C.R.No.I-117 registered Mumbra Police Station executing personal 2005 Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two local sureties in the like amount. (ii) The granted…
Judgment
9th June 2005 passed by this Court in Criminal Application No.3351 of 2005 and claims parity.
147 The offence registered against Applicant co-accused section 302, 326, 323, 143, 148 Indian Penal Code sections 3 25 Arms Act section 37(1) 135 Bombay Police Act,
1951. He submitted alleged played Applicant identical to the role played by the Applicant in Criminal Application No.3351 of 2005.
After having learned Counsel appearing 2 : ::: 2 : 2 : parties, crystal Applicant entitled parity especially criminal antecedents Applicant brought record. A perusal F.I.R. played Applicant herein Applicant Criminal Application No.3351 2005 identical. The allegation against both of them is that they assaulted the victim Prakash by using bamboo sticks.
Operative part
Hence Applicant entitled enlarged bail by reason of parity. Hence the following order is passed:
(i) The Applicant enlarged connection C.R.No.I-117 registered Mumbra Police Station executing personal 2005 Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two local sureties in the like amount.
(ii) The granted subject further condition Applicant falling within jurisdiction Mumbra Police Station till the disposal of the trial without permission of the Sessions Court. 3 : ::: 3 : 3 :
(iii) The Applicant attempt influence prosecution witnesses shall not tamper with the evidence in any manner whatsoever.
(iv) Application is disposed of in the above terms. Judge. Judge. Judge.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of in the above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Arms Act, 1959 — ss. 3, 25; Bombay Police Act, 1951 — ss. 37(1), 135.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Jun 2005. The bench was ABHAY S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.