Judgment · High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3323 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1293 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Avinash K. Jalisatgi for the Applicant. Mr. P.M.Palshikar for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 24th February, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. 2 By the impugned order, the application made under Section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 has been rejected. Hence, no interim relief as prayed can be granted. However, it is made clear that if the contribution amount is deposited by the Applicant, it will be subject to final outcome of the appeal. [ A.S.OKA, J ]
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 — s. 75.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 24 Feb 2011. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.