✦ Bombay High Court · 24 Aug 2009

Smt. Tejal Piyush Satra v. Rajesh P. Mamaniya & Anr.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1932 OF 2008 Smt. Tejal Piyush Satra ..... Applicant vs. Mr. Rajesh P. Mamaniya & Anr. ..... Respondents Mr. P.G. Sawant, Advocate for applicant. Mr. V.V. Purwant, Advocate for the Respondent no.1. Mr. P.A. Pol, APP for State/respondent no.2. CORAM : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDO TA, J. DATED : 24TH AUGUST, 2009. PC :

#1. Admit.

#2. In view of the admission of the Appeal, issue non- bailable warrant against respondent no.1 under section 309 of Cr.P.C. [SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDO TA, J.]

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 309.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 24 Aug 2009. The bench was R P SONDURBALDO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 1932 of 2008). ← Search more judgments