Chandrakant Shankar Dalvi v. Union of India
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Railways Act, 1989 s. 23
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5198 OF 2008 Chandrakant Shankar Dalvi .. Petitioner Vs. Union of India .. Respondents Shri E. R. Naik for petitioner CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & J. P. DEVDHAR, JJ. DATE: 15/1/2009 P.C. . Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant petition because against the impugned order an appeal is maintainable under Section 23 of the Railways Act 1989. The petition is, therefore, allowed to be withdrawn as the petitioner wants to file an appeal. JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Railways Act, 1989 — s. 23.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 15 Jan 2009. The bench was P DEVDHAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.