✦ Bombay High Court

Mahendra Kumar C. Rai v. The State of Maharashtra

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

the circumstances, the petition is dismissed

Judgment

Mr. A. S. Pai, APP for the respondent State. CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM ANDANDAND V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : SEPTEMBER 12, 2007. : SEPTEMBER 12, 2007. : SEPTEMBER 12, 2007. P.C. . A. None present for the petitioner. Mrs. S. Pai, APP present respondent State. When matter called earlier day, appeared petitioner, therefore back. p.m., Again called

12.30 appeared petitioner. In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [[[ R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] Sd/- V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. Sd/-

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1121 of 2007). ← Search more judgments