Sardar Zainulabaddin Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 16 Jul 2008
- Bench
- V K TAHILRAMANI
Outcome
Disposed of
Criminal Application is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 395
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Judgment
.... Mr.Jehangir Khajotia, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 16th July, 2008. DATED : 16th July, 2008. DATED : 16th July, 2008. P.C.:
Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State.
The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.202 of 2004 of Meghwadi Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 395 of IPC.
No eye witness implicates the present applicant. There is no recovery at the instance f the applicant. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant.
The applicant - Sardar Zainulabaddin Shaikh to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- ..(2).. with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Meghwadi Police Station once in a week, till conclusion of the trial. In addition thereto, the applicant shall attend the trial Court on all the dates.
Operative part
Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 395.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 16 Jul 2008. The bench was V K TAHILRAMANI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.