MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 461 v. Ninad Shrikant Deorukhkhar
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 04 Jul 2023
- Bench
- KAMAL KHATA
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 498(a)
- Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ss. 12, 19, 20, 22, 23
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is unable to travel as she has no source of income and she has not been paid any maintenance so far by the respondent-husband. The distance between Bandra to Mahad is around 185 kms., which…
Judgment
Mr. Vishwabhushan Kamble i/b. Mr. Agasti A. Vibhute for the Applicant. … CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J. DATED : 4TH JULY 2023. P.C. :
This Miscellaneous Civil Application is filed by the Applicant wife under section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, for transfer of Marriage Petition No. A-1001/2021 filed by the Respondent husband from Family Court, Bandra to Civil Judge, Senior Division, Alibaug, Mahad Camp, Raigad.
The Applicant’s case is that the marriage took place on 28th November at Mumbai. They have no issues out of wedlock. On account of marital discord, the applicant is staying separately with her parents. The father of the Applicant is aged. The Applicant had made a complaint under Section 498(a) of the Indian Penal Code, 1960 to M.I.D.C. Police Station, Mahad and an F.I.R. was lodged on 26th February 2021. The applicant also filed Domestic Sumedh Violence Proceeding u/s. 12, 19, 20, 22, 23 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. On the other hand, the Respondent filed a petition for divorce at Family Court, Bandra under Section 13(1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (‘HMA’ for short ) bearing Marriage Petition no.1001/2021 .
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is unable to travel as she has no source of income and she has not been paid any maintenance so far by the respondent-husband. The distance between Bandra to Mahad is around 185 kms., which would take 7 to 8 hours to traverse. On the other hand, the respondent is well placed and would not have any inconvenience to travel. A full day's travel with an old parent or a companion and not having a place to stay in Mumbai makes it very difficult for the applicant. He accordingly submits that the application be made absolute.
The law with respect to transfer of proceedings, particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra. The ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Sumita Singh v.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 498(a); Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — ss. 12, 19, 20, 22, 23; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 04 Jul 2023. The bench was KAMAL KHATA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.