✦ Bombay High Court · 29 Aug 2011

Shri Vijay Dhondu Rajam v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4723 OF 2011 Shri Vijay Dhondu Rajam .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4724 OF 2011 Shri Shrikant Avdhut Dharke .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Sandeep Dere for petitioner in both the petitions. Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 in both the petitions. Ms. Vandana Patil i/by Mr. N. K. Rajpurohit for respondent nos.3 and 4 in both the petitions. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE AND SMT. NISHITA MHATRE,JJ. DATE : August 29, 2011 P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioners has invited our 2 aswp-4723-4724-11 attention to the scheme of Section 24(2) of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 and has submitted that he has a remedy of an appeal under the said section against the suspension order passed by respondent no.3. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petitions so as to resort to the remedy of an appeal under Section 24(2) of the said Act. Leave granted and the petitions are disposed as withdrawn. If an appeal under Section 24(2) of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 is filed within a period of two weeks from today, we direct the respondent no.4 to decide the said appeal on its own merits as expeditiously as possible. (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 — s. 24(2).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 29 Aug 2011. The bench was MARLAPALLE, NISHITA MHATRE, B H MARLAPALLE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 4723 of 2011). ← Search more judgments