Shweta Pravin Parmar v. Pune Metropolitan Region Development
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Purti Parab 2
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 265 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2789 OF 2026 Shweta Pravin Parmar Versus … Petitioner Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority and Ors. … Respondents **** Mr. Harjot Singh Alang for the Petitioner. Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 28th APRIL, 2026 P.C. :
This Petition is at a pre-notice stage. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has circulated this Petition vide Motion dated 27th April, 2026 seeking leave to withdraw the Petition as the grievance is redressed. The said praecipe is marked as “X” for identification.
The learned Advocate for the Corporation has tendered a copy of an order dated 23rd April, 2026 ( 9 pages). According to him this takes care of the grievance of the Petitioner. The said order is marked as “Y” for identification. Purti Parab 1 901-CP-265-2026.odt
Operative part
In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Purti Parab 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 28 Apr 2026. The bench was RAVINDRA V GHUGE, HITEN S VENEGAVKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.