Criminal Application No. 2094 of 2006 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 378(4), 390
Judgment
Mr.R.R.Salvi with Mr.Madhukar Harmawar for applicant. Mr.Amarendra Mishra for resp.no.1. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for State in Cri. Application Nos.2094 and 2095 of 2006. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for State in Cri. Application No.2096 of 2006. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for State in Cri. Application No.2097 of 2006. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. July 5, 2007. Heard Mr.Salvi, the learned P.C. . counsel for the applicant - company. . Perused the reasoning set out in acquittal passed learned Metropolitan Magistrate’s 26th Court, Borivli, Mumbai 28/3/2006 C.C. Nos.32/S/2000, 33/S/2000, 35/S/2000 2 and 36/S/2000. . Special leave to appeal under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. is hereby granted. . . . Appeals are admitted. Call for R. & P. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. to follow by the trial Court. . hearing. Liberty to apply for early .
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.