✦ Bombay High Court · 18 May 2007

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. The Workmen working in activity of Sweeping, Cleaning and transporting

Writ Petition No. 3928 of 2007R M SAVANT3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid

Provisions considered

Judgment

. Heard Shri Palshikar learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ranade, the General Secretary of the Respondent No.1 Union.

2.

This petition is filed under Articles 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 8th May, 2007 passed by the learned Member of Industrial Court, on the interim application filed by the respondent No.1 herein in Reference Proceedings IT No.13 of 2007. By the said order, the petitioners herein i.e. the [2] Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai is directed to maintain status quo till the disposal of the application on merits as regards the employment of about 2700 employees, who are engaged in the work of cleaning and sweeping the city of Mumbai.

3.

The said order has been challenged by the petitioners inter-alia on various grounds urged in the petition, primarily on the ground that the Industrial Court did not have jurisdiction to pass the order in the manner it did. The petitioners seek vacation of the said order in view of the facts that the said order has an adverse effect on the tenders invited by them vide Advertisement dated 9/5/2007 for carrying out the work of cleaning and sweeping.

4.

It is pertinent to note that the Petitioner herein had earlier filed Writ Petition No. 971/2007, which came to be disposed of by this Court by its order dated 4th May, 2007. What is significant from the point of view of this petition is that this Court has recorded a finding that there is no employer employee relationship between the said workers and the petitioners herein. In the background of the said [3] order, the petitioners contend that the Industrial Court could not have passed the order of status-quo. The petitioners also rely upon the Judgment of the Apex Secretary, State of Karnataka and Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Secretary, State of Karnataka and

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 18 May 2007. The bench was R M SAVANT.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3928 of 2007). ← Search more judgments