✦ Bombay High Court · 26 Apr 2012

M/s.Sleep-Ins Apparels v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 1550 of 2012P D KODE, V M KANADE

Case at a glance

Decided
26 Apr 2012
Bench
P D KODE, V M KANADE

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. By this petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner is seeking direction for quashing the complaint filed by IDBI Bank being C.C. No.404440 of 2010 which is pending before the J.M.F.C., 14th Court, Pune. Learned A.P.P. appearing…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1550 OF 2012 M/s.Sleep-Ins Apparels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. .. Petitioners. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Majeed Memon i/b MZM Legal for the petitioners. Mr.A.S.Gadkari APP for the State. CORAM : V. M. KANADE & P. D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 26TH APRIL, 2012 P.C.

1.

By this petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner is seeking direction for quashing the complaint filed by IDBI Bank being C.C. No.404440 of 2010 which is pending before the J.M.F.C., 14th Court, Pune. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State submits that though initially order was passed under section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code and police was directed to make investigation. Accordingly, the report was submitted by the police under section 169 of the Criminal Procedure Code and it was treated that no case was made out against the accused. This report, however, is not accepted by the Magistrate and further directions has been given by the Magistrate to proceed with the case. It is, therefore, apparent that the complainant will have to take further steps in the matter and as such at this stage in 2 w1550.12 our view the petition which has been filed for quashing the complaint is filed at premature stage and no process has been issued on the complaint filed by the complainant. The petition, therefore, is disposed of on the ground that is filed prematurely. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to take out appropriate proceedings if the process is issued by the Magistrate. With these directions the petition is disposed of. (P. D. KODE, J.)

(V. M. KANADE, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 156(3), 169.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 26 Apr 2012. The bench was P D KODE, V M KANADE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1550 of 2012). ← Search more judgments