Judgment · High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Sonali 3 of 3
Judgment
Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar, for the Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. V. G. Badgujar, AGP for the Respondent – State. Mr. S. V. Gavand a/w. Mr. P. H. Gaikwad Patil, for Respondent Nos.6 and 7-Zilla Parishad, Pune. Mr. Bhausaheb Jagannath Wanave, Petitioner No.3, is present in Court. Mr. Ambadas Ashru Narute, Petitioner No.4, is present in Court. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 30th APRIL, 2026 P.C.:
The learned Advocate for the Zilla Parishad has tendered a ready reference chart of all these Petitioners, which indicates that ever since they joined duties in between 1993 to 2000, they have been working in plain areas. The said chart is taken on Sonali 1 of 3 record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 904-WP-4594-2026.odt
Having compared ‘X’ with the chart at page 82, it appears that the Petitioners have conveniently filtered information from the learned Advocate for the Petitioners. All details, do not appear to have been transmitted to the learned Advocate for the Petitioners.
The learned Advocate for the Zilla Parishad and the learned Additional Government Pleader rely upon an order dated 17/04/2026, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.3693 of 2026 (Santosh Manik Shinde & Anr. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.), wherein the Petition filed by Petitioners on identical set of facts, was disposed off and no relief was granted by the Court.
The learned Senior Advocate submits on instructions from the learned briefing Advocate that two Petitioners who are present in the Court hall, namely, Shri Bhausaheb Jagannath Wanave (Petitioner No.3) and Shri Ambadas Ashru Narute (Petitioner No.4), instruct the learned Advocate to withdraw this Petition on behalf of all the Petitioners. Sonali 2 of 3 904-WP-4594-2026.odt
Operative part
In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Sonali 3 of 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 30 Apr 2026. The bench was HITEN S VENEGAVKAR, RAVINDRA V GHUGE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.