CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRI.APPLICATION No. 1827 of 2006 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 20 Jun 2006
- Bench
- D B BHOSALE
Outcome
Disposed of
applications are disposed of with liberty to
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
V.K.Jain and others Vs order. This Court in V.K.Jain and others Vs V.K.Jain and others Vs Pratap V Padode and Anr, 2005 (3) Mh.L.J.778, Pratap V Padode and Anr, 2005 (3) Mh.L.J.778, Pratap V Padode and Anr, 2005 (3) Mh.L.J.778, while dealing with similar petition considered several judgments of the Apex Court and has held that the order of issue of process is not an interlocutory order and hence the revision against such order is maintainable. In the circumstances, these applications are disposed of with liberty to the applicants to file revision before the appropriate Court against the order impugned in the instant applications. If such revision is filed, same may be considered in accordance with law. The applications are, accordingly, disposed of.
(D.B.BHOSALE,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: applications are disposed of with liberty to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 141; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 397.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Jun 2006. The bench was D B BHOSALE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.