Civil Revision Application No. 2076 of 2002 · Bombay High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Subject to what is stated above, Revision Application is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Judgment
Shri Samir Suryawanshi for the Petitioners. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : MARCH 20, 2007. DATED : MARCH 20, 2007. DATED : MARCH 20, 2007. DATED
On the oral prayer made by the Advocate for the Petitioners, Revision Application is restored.
The learned Advocate for the Petitioners states that the main civil suit has been now finally decided. By the order impugned of this Revision, Application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the Plaintiff has been allowed. In view of the disposal of the suit, now the Revision Application does not survive. However, if the decree passed in the suit is adverse to the Petitioners, they can always challenge the order impugned in this Revision Application while preferring an Appeal against the decree.
Subject to what is stated above, Revision Application is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.