✦ Bombay High Court · 09 Jul 2007

Shri Tukaram Siddhu Khot v. Laxman Appa Gavade

Writ Petition No. 4277 of 2007A S OKA

Case at a glance

Decided
09 Jul 2007
Bench
A S OKA

Provisions considered

Judgment

Shri Tukaram Siddhu Khot .... Petitioners since deceased through heirs & LRs Smt. Sakhubai Tukaram Khot & Ors. Vs. Laxman Appa Gavade .... Respondents since deceased through heirs & LRs Tanaji Laxman Gavade & Ors. Mr. Vijay Mane for the Petitioners. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 9TH JULY, 2007 DATE : 9TH JULY, 2007 DATE : 9TH JULY, 2007 P.C. 1) Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioners. By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 in proceedings relating to the mutation entries. It is well settled position of law that the authorities under the said Code of 1966 cannot decide the issue regarding the title to the immovable property in the proceeding relating to mutation entries. The orders passed by the said authorities never bind a Civil Court while dealing with a suit on title. In view of this legal position, it is not necessary to entertain the Writ 2 Petition. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. 2) All contentions of the parties on the issue of title are expressly kept open. (A.S. OKA, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)

(A.S. OKA, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 09 Jul 2007. The bench was A S OKA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 4277 of 2007). ← Search more judgments