Israil Mohd. Ali Khan v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The Application stands dismissed as withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) Sufiyan Syed - PA 1 of 1
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.600 OF 2026 Israil Mohd. Ali Khan Versus ….Applicant The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….Respondents Mr. Rahul Raj i/b. R. Sathyanarayanan, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 18th APRIL, 2026 P.C.:
Upon request of the learned Advocate for the Applicant. The Application is permitted to be withdrawn as it was made clear that there is no satisfactory ground to expedite the hearing of the trial pending before the learned Sessions Judge 27th Court at Mumbai.
Operative part
The Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) Sufiyan Syed - PA 1 of 1
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Application stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Apr 2026. The bench was HITEN S VENEGAVKAR, SESSIONS.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.