✦ Bombay High Court · 15 Feb 2008

Union of India & Anr. v. Kumar Bhagwandas Shroff

R S MOHITE5 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Remanded

is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the

Provisions considered

Judgment

. Learned Counsel for the respondent in suport of the order has sought to place reliance on the Mohtesham Mohd. judgment of the Supreme Court in Mohtesham Mohd. Mohtesham Mohd. Ismail vs. Spl. Director, Enforcement Directorate Ismail vs. Spl. Director, Enforcement Directorate Ismail vs. Spl. Director, Enforcement Directorate

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 15 Feb 2008. The bench was R S MOHITE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments