✦ Bombay High Court · 05 Aug 2005

Sou. Preeti Eknath Kandale v. Shri Eknath Keshav Kandale

Civil Application No. 40 of 2005B H MARLAPALLE2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. During the course of hearing it was suggested that the spouses explore the possibilities of putting an end to the matrimonial disputes and with the active support of the learned counsel for them, the spouses realised that the marriage had rescinded and, therefore, it…

Judgment

Shri Eknath Keshav Kandale .. Respondent Mr. Sandesh Patil for applicant. Ms. Smita Gaidhani for respondent. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : August 05, 2005. Date : August 05, 2005. Date : August 05, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:

1.

This application was moved by the applicant-wife praying for transfer of petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 filed by the respondent-husband in the Family Court at Pune. The petition was numbered as Petition No.103 of 2004.

2.

During the course of hearing it was suggested that the spouses explore the possibilities of putting an end to the matrimonial disputes and with the active support of the learned counsel for them, the spouses realised that the marriage had rescinded and, therefore, it was in the interest of both of them to :2: separate by consent. Accordingly, they discussed the terms of the settlement amongst themselves with the help of the learned counsel and the terms were finalised. The consent terms have been reduced in writing and placed before this court. They have been signed by both the spouses and their respective counsel. The consent terms were marked as "X" for identification. Both the parties have agreed to withdraw the cases filed against each other and the respondent-husband has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.5 lacs as full and final settlement of the maintenance amount to the applicant-wife. The applicant-wife, in turn, agreed that on receipt of the said amount, she waives off her right for future maintenance of any kind. The husband, in turn, has agreed to deposit the amount of Rs.5 lacs in the Family Court at Pune on or before 26th August, 2005. An application would be submitted in Marriage Petition No.103 of 2004, presently pending before the Family Court at Pune, to convert it into an application for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the deposited amount of Rs.5 lacs would be withdrawn by the applicant-wife as soon as the decree :3: of divorce is granted.

3.

The consent terms are in the interest of both the parties and undoubtedly they shall be binding on them. This application, therefore, stands disposed off in terms of the consent terms and the parties shall take further steps early. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 9.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 05 Aug 2005. The bench was B H MARLAPALLE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 40 of 2005). ← Search more judgments