✦ Bombay High Court

Rathiram Shivjatan Yadav v. Grievance Redressal Committee

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 2 WP 5134.26.doc Dusane

Judgment

Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni a/w Mr. Dipak Mane for Petitioner. Ms. Snehal S. Jadhav, AGP for State. Mr. Yatin Shashikant Khochare “B” Panel Counsel for Respondent no. 1 to 3 – State. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 25h August 2026 P.C. :

#1. The learned AGP submits that an alternate remedy of appeal is available to the Petitioner against the impugned order. In view of the said submission, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition, with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy available in law.

#2. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 2 WP 5134.26.doc Dusane

#3. The delay in pursuing the present Petition shall be excluded while computing the period of limitation for filing the Appeal. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 2 WP 5134.26.doc Dusane

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 5134 of 2026). ← Search more judgments