Civil Petition No. 224 of 2004 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the service report and what is stated in the affidavits on record, no case is made out for taking any action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the contemnors. Accordingly the notice issued to the contemnors is discharged and…
Judgment
Smt. Mandabai Pandurang Pawar & ors. ... Respondents. Shri C.G.Gavnekar for the Petitioner. Shri Sachin Gite holding for Ms.Kanchan Karangutkar for the Respondents Nos.1 to 4. Shri D.A.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.6. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM DATED : 26th April, 2007. : 26th April, 2007. DATED DATED : 26th April, 2007.
Submissions of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties are heard. When it is brought to the notice of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that there is no effective service of order dated 14th October 2002 passed by this Court in Civil Application No.1082 of 2002 in Second Appeal No.775 of 2002, the learned Counsel fairly stated that he is not pressing the contempt petition.
In view of the service report and what is stated in the affidavits on record, no case is made out for taking any action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the contemnors. Accordingly the notice issued to the contemnors is discharged and the petition is 2 : ::: 2 : 2 : disposed of.
It is made clear that the dismissal of the contempt petition will not prevent the Petitioner from adopting appropriate remedy on the basis of the order dated 14th October 2002. Judge. Judge. Judge.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 26 Apr 2007. The bench was ABHAY S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.