Chanda Construction Company v. Gammon India Ltd & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Jun 2008
- Bench
- S VAZIFDAR
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Appeal from Order and the Civil Application are disposed of accordingly.
Judgment
Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar for the Appellant. Mr.Shekhar Shetye with Mr.Subodh S. Kurdukar for Respondent No.1. Ms.Sonali Shinde i/b. M/s. Consulta Juris for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Admit. Heard finally.
An unaffirmed copy of an affidavit has been tendered in Court to the Appellant’s Advocate. Mr.Shetye states that the affidavit will be affirmed by tomorrow.
In addition, Mr.Shetye seeks to tender to the learned Advocate an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Mr.Warunjikar however states that he has no : 2 : instructions to accept the same. The same shall therefore be served upon the Advocate in the trial Court.
If the Notice of Motion cannot be heard for any reason within two weeks from today, the Appellant is at liberty to make a fresh application for ad-interim reliefs.
Appeal from Order and the Civil Application are disposed of accordingly.
All the contentions including those under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act are kept open. ***
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 8.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 23 Jun 2008. The bench was S VAZIFDAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.