Zulfiqar Abdur Raheem Dada v. The State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.180 OF 2006 Zulfiqar Abdur Raheem Dada .. Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.Kaushik Jayant i/b Mr.Parvez Ubharay for the petitioner. Ms.M.M.Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the order dated 17.5.2006 passed under section 117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the execution of bond under section 107 thereof this petition challenging the show cause notice dated
3.1.2006 issued under section 111 of the Code has become infructuous. The revision application is disposed of as infructuous. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 117.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Jun 2006. The bench was D B BHOSALE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.