Judgment · High Court · 2006
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In availability efficatious remedy, Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is rejected.
Judgment
Judgment
#1. This Writ Petitioned Article 227 Constitution India challenging
February 2006 passed 8th learned Judge Family Court, Mumbai. The made under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
#2. An efficatious remedy filing a Revision Application sub-Section 4 Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 is available to the Petitioner. :2:
#3. In availability efficatious remedy, Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is rejected.
#4. Notwithstanding rejection Petition it will Petitioner challenge the impugned order by filing appropriate proccedings. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 125.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 25 Aug 2006. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.