Pradeep Sakharam Wadekar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard. Mr. M.P.Vashi learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition in view of the provision of section 7(1) of Maharashtra Scheduled Caste, Sheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance…
Judgment
Ms. Shama Ghotukar i/b S. B. Shetye for respondent no.5 CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & D.G.KARNIK,JJ. D.G.KARNIK,JJ. D.G.KARNIK,JJ. DATE: JULY 18, 2007. DATE: JULY 18, 2007. DATE: JULY 18, 2007. P.C.P.C. P.C.
Operative part
Heard. Mr. M.P.Vashi learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition in view of the provision of section 7(1) of Maharashtra Scheduled Caste, Sheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000, i.e., Act No. 23 of 2001 as he wants to approach the Caste Scrutiny Committee. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.)
(S.B.MHASE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate Act, 2000.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Jul 2007. The bench was D G KARNIK, S B MHASE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.