Bapu Gokul Gharat & Ors. v. The Deputy Director, Land Records & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 May 2005
- Bench
- S A BOBDE
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. R. S. Thakur for the petitioners. Mr.P. I. Khemani, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 5. ... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : MAY 3, 2005. P.C.:
In this petition, the petitioners have prayed that respondent No.3 be directed to permit the petitioners to intervene and represent their case in the matter of proceedings under section 35 of the Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947, in respect of suit property i.e. survey no.47, gat No.12, admeasuring 207 As 9 G situated at village Belpada, taluka Panvel. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 submits that the State has no objection if the petitioners are permitted to intervene in the matter. We request respondent No.3 to hear all affected parties, including the petitioners, before passing any order in 2 the aforesaid matter.
No further directions are necessary. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- S.A. BOBDE, J.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — s. 35.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 03 May 2005. The bench was S A BOBDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.