✦ Bombay High Court · 23 Mar 2010

Mr.Nandkumar Suresh Kedari & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra

Criminal Application No. 1212 of 2010R S MOHITE

Case at a glance

Decided
23 Mar 2010
Bench
R S MOHITE

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.Nandkumar Suresh Kedari and anr. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr.A.P.Mundergi, Sr.Advocate i/by S. Mehta for the Applicant. Mr. Y.S.Shinde, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 23rd March, 2010 PC : 1 This is a sixth anticipatory bail application made by the present applicants who are shown as absconding accused in C.R.No.20/2008 registered by Jaigad Police Station, Ratnagiri for alleged offences under Section 384, 387, 436, 511 read with 120B of the I.P.C. and U/s. 3 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. Out of the earlier five bail applications filed in this court two applications were withdrawn and three were 2 rejected. Last rejection order was passed on

24.10.2008. In spite of this position, it is clear that the applicant did not surrender. Trial against the co accused proceeded and according to the applicants material that was used against the present applicants could not proved at the trial and therefore, co accused were acquitted. This acquittal according to the applicants is the change of circumstance. The applicants state that as the co accused were acquitted, they are also likely to be acquitted. In the circumstances, they may be granted anticipatory bail. This argument is misconceived. After applicants are arrested, the possibility of fresh evidence cannot be ruled out. The prosecution will also be entitled to make an attempt to prove the material which was held not to be proved. In the circumstances, not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, application is rejected.

( R.S. MOHITE, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120B, 384, 387, 436, 511.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 23 Mar 2010. The bench was R S MOHITE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 1212 of 2010). ← Search more judgments