The State of Maharashtra v. Camp, Pune-1
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Mar 2007
- Bench
- D G DESHPANDE, NISHITA MHATRE
Outcome
Allowed
Therefore, the application is allowed in terms of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Therefore, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b) and stands disposed of. 2
Judgment
Mr. P.A. Pol, A.P.P. for the applicant. CORAM: D. G. DESHPANDE & D. G. DESHPANDE & CORAM: CORAM: D. G. DESHPANDE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 29TH MARCH, 2007. 29TH MARCH, 2007. DATED: DATED: 29TH MARCH, 2007. P.C.: P.C.P.C.
This is an application filed by the State for issuing proclamation or notice against the respondent accused under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C. The appeal is already admitted. It is pending since 1995.
Operative part
Therefore, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b) and stands disposed of. 2
Necessary action pursuant to this order to be taken against the respondent. (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)
(SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the application is allowed in terms of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 29 Mar 2007. The bench was D G DESHPANDE, NISHITA MHATRE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.