✦ Bombay High Court · 29 Mar 2007

Ajay Maheshwari & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 513 of 2007B H MARLAPALLE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Hence the petition is allowed and Rule is made

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Hence the petition is allowed and Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (c).

(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence the petition is allowed and Rule is made

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 29 Mar 2007. The bench was B H MARLAPALLE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 513 of 2007). ← Search more judgments