ANOOP v. MOHTA, J
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2007 CIVIL INININ APPEAL NO.318 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO.318 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO.318 OF 2007 SECOND - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Orders Registrar’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Prashant Patil for the Applicants. Mr.Vishwanath S.Talkute for Respondent Nos.1 to 7. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 2nd May, 2008 : 2nd May, 2008 DATED DATED : 2nd May, 2008 P.C. P.C.P.C. . In view of the dismissal of the Second Appeal, nothing survives in this Civil Application and is also dismissed, accordingly. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 02 May 2008. The bench was ANOOP V MOHTA, V MOHTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.