Farood Minocher Godrej v. The Commissioner, State Excise & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
the petition is dismissed they will pay in terms of the
Provisions considered
Judgment
Application disposed of accordingly. (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO, J) F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAVANT,J.) (R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petition is dismissed they will pay in terms of the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 09 Mar 2007. The bench was R M SAVANT, F I REBELLO R M SAVANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1621 of 2006).
← Search more judgments