✦ Bombay High Court · 09 Mar 2007

Mahasangh v. Board & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 1489 of 2007F I REBELLO

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. S.S. Pakale, for the petitioner F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : CORAM : F.I.F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : REBELLO & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 9TH MARCH, 2007 DATED : 9TH MARCH, 2007. DATED : 9TH MARCH, 2007 P.C. P.C.P.C. . Heard Counsel for the petitioner. The only relief which can be granted is if the members of the petitioners whose names are annexed at Exhibit "B" applied to the respondent NO.1 for registration. The respondent No.1 to consider the same and dispose of the application according to law at any rate not later than eight weeks from the receipt of the application. With the above observation petition disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO, J) F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAVANT,J.) (R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 09 Mar 2007. The bench was F I REBELLO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1489 of 2007). ← Search more judgments