N.S.Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Partly allowed
The Petition is partly allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned APP and learned counsel for Respondent No.2, I pass following order. ORDER (i) The Petition is partly allowed. (ii) The JMFC, Borvali shall decide the pending CC No.1907/PW/2017 as early as possible preferably…
Judgment
Mr.Durgesh Rege, for the Petitioner. Mr.S.M. Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr.Dhananjay Bhosale, for Respondent No.2. ____________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 24th AUGUST 2026 P.C. : . By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking expedite the CC No.1907/PW/2017 pending before the 26th Judicial Magistrate First Class, Borivali, Mumbai (‘JMFC’ for short), since 2017.
#2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned APP and learned counsel for Respondent No.2, I pass following order. ORDER (i) The Petition is partly allowed. (ii) The JMFC, Borvali shall decide the pending CC No.1907/PW/2017 as early as possible preferably within one year, after receipt of this order. N.S.Kamble 58-WP-634-2026 (CR).doc (iii) The learned Judge shall decide Discharge Application, as early as possible, preferably within two months, after receipt of this order. (iv) All pending Applications are disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Petition is partly allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 24 Aug 2026. The bench was SHIVKUMAR DIGE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.