Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 173(8)
Judgment
Mr. J. M. Puranik, advocate for the applicant. Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM ANDANDAND V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : OCTOBER 18, 2007. : OCTOBER 18, 2007. : OCTOBER 18, 2007. P.C. . Heard. Learned advocate for the applicant states enable applicant approach concerned S. 173(8) Cr.P.C., account failure police authorities complete investigation proper manner, applicant craves a withdraw present application. Accordingly, application is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as withdrawn. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [[[ R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] Sd/- Sd/- V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.