Mr. Hilal J. Pawar v. Commissioner of Ulhasnagar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Keeping the points raised in the Writ Petition open, the Writ Petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. [ M.W. CHANDWANI, J. ] [ A. S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] Aarti Palkar 2/2 29.WP.1066.2023.doc
Judgment
Mr. Hilal J. Pawar Vs. Commissioner of Ulhasnagar, .. Petitioner Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. R.D. Soni a/w. Mr. Sujay Gawade a/w. Ms. Mudita Pawar i/b. Shree & Co., for the Petitioner. Ms. R.M. Shinde, AGP for Respondent No.3-State. Mr. Suresh M. Kamble, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2-Corporation. CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR & M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ. DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2023. P.C. :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the regularization application dated 01.02.2023 that was preferred by the petitioner came to be rejected by Respondent No.2. AARTI G PALKAR Digitally signed by AARTI G PALKAR 14:14:14 +0530 Aarti Palkar 1/2 29.WP.1066.2023.doc
In the light of the fact that the rejection of the regularization application can be subjected to challenge under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966, a liberty is granted to the petitioner to take recourse to such proceedings.
Operative part
Keeping the points raised in the Writ Petition open, the Writ Petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. [ M.W. CHANDWANI, J. ] [ A. S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] Aarti Palkar 2/2 29.WP.1066.2023.doc
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 15 Feb 2023. The bench was M W CHANDWANI, A S CHANDURKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.