Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited v. The Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The petitioner is seeking limited relief of directions to the concerned District Magistrate at Daman to decide pending application bearing No.15 of 2022, filed under Section 14 of the the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Securitisation…
- Para 44. The writ petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Priya Kambli
Judgment
Mr. Nikhil Mehta for petitioner (through video-conferencing). Mr. Harsh Dedhia for respondent. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & DATE : SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ 02nd FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C. : . Since the sole respondent is represented by counsel, this petition is taken up for final disposal on the first date of hearing itself.
The petitioner is seeking limited relief of directions to the concerned District Magistrate at Daman to decide pending application bearing No.15 of 2022, filed under Section 14 of the the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Securitisation Act), within a stipulated period of time. We are of the opinion that such applications filed under the provisions of the Securitisation Act, ought to be decided on priority.
Hence, the District Magistrate at Daman is directed to hear and finally dispose of the aforesaid pending application within a period of four weeks from today. PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI 10:21:04 +0530
Operative part
The writ petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Priya Kambli
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.